Negli ultimi mesi sono state messe in luce diverse criticità di Google Analytics, emerse all’interno di campagne di comunicazione lanciate da cittadini italiani. Queste campagne chiedono un serio adeguamento al GDPR, soprattutto da parte della pubblica amministrazione e dalle società che fanno servizi per la PA.
Comprensione delle “risorse di terze parti”
Comprensione dei fattori di rischio di strumenti come Google Analytics sul GDPR
Comprensione dei principali metadati raccoglibili attraverso il protocollo HTTP
Comprensione dei cookie
Cos’è il progetto Monitora PA
Comprensione del concetto di 100% data ownership
Esplorazione di soluzioni di data ownership come Matomo Analytics (software libero)
Il webinar è consigliato a:
Agenzie di comunicazione sul web
Digital Project Manager
Il video è stato rilasciato dal gentilissimo team di Rete Informatica Lavoro a questo indirizzo in licenza CC BY-SA (non è possibile sceglierla su YouTube ma è questa quella valida):
Slide #2 Ho detto che “nella vita reale sono uno sviluppatore”. Ovviamente anche il volontariato è la mia vita reale! Ho anche detto che “mi piace contribuire”. Mi riferisco al piacere di contribuire ai contenuti. Chiunque può farlo, basta solo iniziare a farlo e dialogare con gli altri e cercare di comprendere le regole della community.
Domande finali: “Cosa ne pensi di Brave?” Quando ho detto che Brave non è stato ancora accettato dalla community di Debian, significa che Brave non è un pacchetto Debian. Invece Firefox e Chromium sono pacchetti nativi del rilascio stabile di Debian e, di conseguenza, disponibili su migliaia di distribuzioni GNU/Linux.
Domande finali: “Supporto di Matomo nelle Conversions?” Sarebbe interessante richiedere l’aiuto di una persona che conosca bene di cosa stiamo parlando per sapere se questo copre le proprie necessità: https://matomo.org/guide/reports/goals-and-conversions/ Personalmente io uso questo componente e mi trovo molto soddisfatto ma non so se ciò che faccio io è esattamente ciò che si aspettava chi ha posto la domanda.
Domanda finale in privato: “Cosa ne pensi di questo software VPN?” Una banale VPN per uso domestico non dovrebbe necessitare di alcun tipo di software proprietario per essere usata, quindi astenersi da installare roba da pubblicità in Internet senza prima verificare che quella VPN funzioni anche soltanto con software liberi ben testati e universalmente noti (come OpenVPN, WireGuard, etc.). Quindi, un conto è voler cambiare il proprio indirizzo IP pubblico, un conto è rischiare di compromettere ancora di più il proprio dispositivo eseguendo potenziale malware o spyware.
Questo non era un webinar per parlare della navigazione individuale, ma nel quotidiano a parte Firefox o Chromium, suggerisco estensioni come uBlock Origin e impostando il proprio browser per eliminare i cookie all’uscita, inviare DNT e rifiutare i cookie di terze parti, come minimo. Personalmente uso molto anche NoScript.
Detto ciò, ringrazio tutte le persone che lavorano a siti web e che ci aiutano a creare meno “mostri digitali”! :)
Welcome in copyrights should be forever: your friendly handbook guide for pure evil authors.
Spoiler: copyrights do not last forever. But with this guide you can make them last a very looooong time. Muaauahahah!
Rule n. 1: You have copyrights
It happened! Do you remember when? You incised a new artwork on your school desk; you whistled a new astonishing tune in the shower; you wrote that beautiful poem about your ex partner; you draw a rat with round ears; etc.
Note: this guide is designed to empower your pure evil copyrights and raise your new Disney monopoly. This guide will not accept any refunds for people who will use this power to help others instead, for example adopting Creative Commons licenses.
Warning: It’s OK to dream your copyright monopoly but if you get the urge to extend copyrights for 400 years to protect a business over a damn hand-drawn rat, please consult a good doctor.
Facts about copyrights:
copyrights give you a monopoly by default
even without writing “all rights reserved” in bold
This means that if you create something original, you have a monopoly by default. You can be the only one on your planet able to copy it, and the only one able to decide who should use it and when.
Note that while this is the world of the Internet, and it costs little to no money to copy paste and send a song to billions of people, you have incredibly powerful rights that can stop this spread very effectively.
Anyway, death is for everyone, and it will touch your copyrights too.
Rule n. 2: Copyright has a deadline
You can try to build antennas to amplify your copyright signal.
Anyway, even with powerful antennas, your copyright power does not last forever and after some years your work enters the public domain.
Under public domain, the game is over, my friend: your evil empire has vanished. Your work doesn’t belong to a master anymore, and anyone can make whatever other creative stuff with it (movies, T-shirts etc.) without any written authorization.
Important: in short, to keep your monopoly, you have to fight public domain or convert public domain into something that is not public domain.
So the first thing you should do, is: try to extend your evil copyright powers as long as possible. Yaah!
One of the evil things you can do to kill public domain and enlarge your empire, is transforming public domain, for example, doing “creative digitalization” (HAHA!) taking “original photos” (HAHA!) of something in public domain, or stuff like that. Trust me: people will become mad for this.
But you also need some friends to kill public domain. Note this name: Sonny Bono and his wife.
Uh? Who? Sonny Bono was a nice songwriter and a great politician. As songwriter Sonny Bono wrote… uhm… surely something (OK now I don’t remember anything in particular). As politician, instead, he supported this great piece of paper we will remember forever:
In short, Sonny Bono tried to extend his copyrights and everyone-in-the-world’s copyrights with this law. I don’t know if this can be considered a conflict of interest but the important fact is that he reached this goal successfully in 1998! Good for our evil empire.
Extends the duration of copyright in a work created on or after January 1, 1978, to the life of the author and 70 (currently, 50) years after the author’s death. Makes the same extension with regard to joint works created on or after such date.
This resulted in the historic lawsuits Eldred vs Ashcroft where some cute authors who had some cute business on public domain materials complained about a law that largely limited their room for maneuver, judging this law unconstitutional.
The lawyer “against Sonny Bono” was Lawrence Lessig. But I guess you already know this name. Lessig tried to fight with all his energy but, without our team of evil super-lawyers, Lessig lost. Again, it’s a good news for your evil empire.
Rule n. 3: stronger copyright, stronger Creative Commons
Now you understand why in 2001 Lawrence Lessig helped in founding Creative Commons. Using copyright like a jujutsu, using the power of your enemy against it.
The core idea was similar to the one of the licenses written by Richard Stallman to protect Free Software: the copyright holder uses Creative Common licenses to give people more permissions over creative digital works, instead of denying all of them.
Note that, at the time, there was only the GNU Free Documentation License as an “attractive jujutsu license” for authors for creative contents. In short, the GNU FDL was just adopted for source code documentation and not for much more creative things (even if even Wikipedia adopted it for some time – so it wasn’t really such a lame license). That’s the moment when Creative Commons licenses were written and highly appreciated by creative authors.
When Creative Commons was founded in 2001, the internet was a budding universe with high potential, and platforms widely used today like Wikipedia and Google were only just getting started. CC’s founders were keen to hit the ground running, building on their work to ensure that, as the internet continued to grow, safeguards to knowledge, culture, and creativity were firmly in place.
they support events and work with other organizations
they offer certifications and other tools
they work to help creative authors to share their work without relying on «all rights reserved» but «some rights reserved» instead
Creative Commons is a set of licenses
for example the “free cultural work” licenses:
CC 0 (special license – public domain)
these license are adopted by Wikipedia, StackOverflow and lot of other platforms where collaboration should be encouraged and legally sustained
Creative Commons is a movement very active also on the copyleft front, fighting the restrictive “default” copyright culture of «all rights reserved», providing valid alternatives. This movement is a network of global and local movements, from Europe, Japan and South Korea and much more, causing CC license proliferation.
Rule n. 4: Creative Commons are everywhere
Pay attention, monopoly builder: Creative Commons works are under every corner!
Do you know what? YouTube, that platform with billions of visits, allows creators to upload videos under CC BY license:
Lot of people joined communities to work together to kill your evil empire of «all rights reserved». For example, the CC Global Network is a community of members committed to spread Creative Commons in the world.
To join, you must choose two existing Individual Members to vouch for you:
The Open GLAM project seeks to invite museums, cultural institutions, archives, libraries, and many others on how to better achieve their preservation and dissemination goals through digitization and Creative Commons licensing, especially thanks to archival projects like Wikimedia Commons.
Wikidata is another very interesting platform that is changing the world, allowing to store and search almost whatever metadata about any artwork in the world, and other things that proprietary archives often does not allow in such scale. That is very loved by GLAMs.
To do that, GLAMs have a real framework of licenses and case studies and other tools to amplify their impact on human beings, without relying on «all rights reserved».
In short. If you want to make a monopoly, you don’t have to do anything, you’re already doing it. If instead you want to contribute to global knowledge, join Creative Commons and promote public domain (CC 0), CC BY, or copyleft (CC BY-SA) to spread “free as in freedom cultural works“. Or, at least, try other compromises such as the non-commercial or non-derivative versions.
Thank you for reading!
This post is the result of the Creative Commons certification assignment.
I mean, I was not paid to write this post. I’m just doing my homework!
You can do whatever you want with the texts and the images in this page, as long as you give the rights credits and as long as you don’t put “all rights reserved” on this stuff.
Hi! I’m boz. Today I had a problem with my new Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. I was trying to reject the terms and conditions of Xiaomi, remove all the GoogleShit, and install Android LineageOS.
Spoiler: it was a bloodbath.
Preamble (don’t arrest me!)
Note. Rejecting terms and conditions is not an insane, lamer or illegal operation. Moreover, Android is basically the Android Open Source Project, designed to be used and improved by vendors, developers and end-users for whatever purpose. If you think otherwise, maybe you have an iPhone.
Xiaomi knows that. Probably because they are made in China; low cost; intrinsic healthy spirit of sharing tech stuff in DNA, plus other stereotypes I don’t know. Xiaomi has a nice procedure to unlock your bootloader, in order to use their hardware without software obligation.
Hello support! I am trying to reject the terms and conditions. I was following this official Xiaomi proced… Yes I want to unlock the bootloader for personal motiv… Yes the bootloader, the thing on my phone that you have locked down… No no I’m not talking about the unlock screen… Yes I want to remove Google from my phone and I need to unlock my phone. No no it’s… uhm… OK. Shibboleet?
― not exactly my phone call but quite similar
Long story short, after 10 hours of troubleshooting, trying multiple Microsoft Windows versions (bleah), multiple USB ports, multiple Chinese drivers (I mean, literally in Chinese, from website to documentation and URLs) and after selling my soul to Satana installing the most borked unofficial software of the dark web, I was then able to reject the terms and conditions, unlocking my bootloader.
It’s a suspicious URL but I think it’s legitimate since it comes from a “Xiaomi Super moderator”. Note that fresh users in the Xiaomi forum are not called “Super moderator” but are called “Rookie Bunny”. Yup, I am one of them 🥕.
So, it seems the official Xiaomi unlock tool, in recent versions, has not the possibility to install the right drivers anymore. But, that version above will install good old drivers (using the top-right menu of the application). Then, since that old version is completely outdated and stuck to the login screen, then I was able to proceed with the recent normal unlock tool (https://en.miui.com/unlock/).
Puff! Now I have a Xiaomi Note 7 phone, flashed with LineageOS instead, and without any proprietary Google application, refusing both Google’s and Xiaomi’s terms and conditions, since I don’t use their services.
That’s why today I’m happy with Xiaomi!
Yesterday, anyway, I was in the mood How far can I throw this phone?
So, What I suggest to Xiaomi
0 First of all, even if there is room for improvement, thank you for allowing users to refuse Xiaomi terms and conditions and have an official Xiaomi procedure and tool for that. For example to unlock my phone, to allow to clean my phone, do my stuff on my phone, increase privacy on my phone, etc. You are working in the right direction!
1 Often people who want to unlock their phones do so to avoid proprietary software. So they don’t want to use Microsoft Windows. If you can, make the unlocking procedure not require proprietary software or Microsoft Windows.
2 There are many unofficial Free and Open Source software that work better that the official proprietary one. This is surprisingly frequent but potentially very good for you. So, since you’re smart, I suggest to don’t kill these developers using your lawyers. Instead, contact these developers, support them, hire them, encourage them to write more good Free/Libre and Open Source software for Xiaomi devices.
3 Before you say “Oh my God there are too much Leenocs distributions to support!” keep calm and just take Ubuntu 20.04 LTS that is very mainstream, and start giving support to that. Amazingly, you will also support Trisquel GNU/Linux at no costs and a truckload of other distributions, giving more support to Xiaomi devices and more freedom to users.
4 Since it seems somebody in the world somehow already knows what your software does (I explain better later), do not try to obfuscate it. Instead, just release your software (as much as you can!) as Free/Libre and Open Source. It is a winning business strategy for Xiaomi to make experts happy, because they are the ones who then recommend Xiaomi phones to others. Additionally, you would have improvements and fixes from other experts all around the world, pratically improving Xiaomi support for you, and, more important, you will be able to easily find skilled developers to hire directly from your contributors, in a virtuous circle that boosts your loyalty marketing and puts more money in your piggy bank.
For example, it seems the world is really happy to have an unofficial unlock tool called XiaoMiToolV2 made by Francesco Tescari, who tried to understand what Xiaomi’s official software does to improve it. The result. It works for 3 operating systems (Microsoft Windows – macOS and GNU/Linux!) and is also able to flash ROMs, unbrick your Xiaomi device (!), restore factory data, support multiple languages and, among other features, it’s probably also able to give a good orgasm to the motherboard. Unfortunately, Francesco cannot release its source code because he is afraid of legal repercussions from Xiaomi. Remember, the official Xiaomi tool just works for Microsoft Windows (uff), sometime it does not work, and it’s ugly as hell (with all due respect) and, above all, its code is obfuscated (security through obscurity).
Dear Xiaomi, hire the Italian IT guy named Francesco Tescari. Give him permissions to do whatever he wants. Instead of sending Francesco to a Chinese jail, allow him to write more official documentation, produce more Free/Libre and Open Source software. For example, to convert Xiaomi phones into kitten-bots, create camera-enabled mosquito-killers etc. making Android experts damn happy to work with Xiaomi for their projects and damn inclined to play with Xiaomi hardware and reccommend Xiaomi to IT companies, local resellers and end users.
And what can Xiaomi do on Wednesday? Donate some devices and some documentation to Replicant, LineageOS and donate to the Free Software Foundation, and share the news to the world! They are definitely your friends. It’s pennies to you, but would be a crazy gratis advertising and a crazy big step for the Xiaomi corporate image.
Phone image by Minette Lontsie, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Common Screenshot by Valerio Bozzolan and the owners of each single logo under same license
Do not ask me why a Java application was issuing VirtualBox commands. It’s too painful to remember certain things. In any case, there is no reason in the world why it shouldn’t work. Or maybe one. Anyway I’ve learned more about Systemd silly features and that day was awesome.
It’s not a secret. I’m very happy to see some effects after my recent years of contributions in the Free as in Freedom software movement and about GNU/Linux topics, for example contributing to the Linux Day Torino event.
How much friends I’ve found, how much skills I’ve learned.
How much more I’ve to learn.
In particular, I’m proud about these two editions where I’ve given my heart for the event:
Now, after COVID-19 recentness, the Linux Day Torino will not be proposed for 2020, and it’s somehow very sad.
…before thinking about the possibility to give an hand in a new national edition, completely online.
But… hey, Wikimedian(s) have very similar problems! Why not involve them and organize two different online conferences in the same day? One about Free as in Freedom software, and the other about Free as in Freedom contents?
Here we are, running all together for an amazing online edition of a giant itWikiCon 2020 + Linux Day 2020 event.
Let’s see what it will become! Good luck to everybody!